With concerns over the Coronavirus spreading, we think US Retailers will likely be viewed as near-term relative safe-haven stocks given limited direct exposure to China. However, should the virus spread into a pandemic, especially in China, we see a greater impact to US retailers from indirect supply chain exposure or US GDP growth.
Search Coverage List, Models & Reports
Search Results1-10 out of 215
To help gear up for 2020 we analyzed 2019 performance, identified 10 key themes into 2020, analyzed post Q3 earnings reaction, and analyzed the key issue facing each stock under coverage into 2020.
RH reported Q3 2019 results today (12/04/19) post market with total revenue of $677m in-line with Cons. $676m/our $677m. Adj. EBITDA of $116m was above Cons. $103m and our $104m. Q4 guidance was only nudged up slightly but was framed as being conservative.
Two weeks ago, we assumed broader coverage of Hardlines and Internet Retail and issued four deep dive reports including a downgrade of LOW to Peer Perform and reiterated HD, BBY, and W at Outperform. We also assumed coverage of AMZN, ULTA, WSM, RH, TSCO, and SHW (see our 1-page tear sheets here). Finally, we utilized the broader coverage as an opportunity to reposition our legacy auto part retail coverage and downgrade AAP to Underperform and upgraded ORLY to Outperform.
Today (10/07/19) we are assuming broader coverage of hardlines and internet retail with deep-dive reports on four companies, including a LOW downgrade to PP. We also have two ratings changes from our existing retail coverage (AAP to UP and ORLY to OP), and assuming coverage of six additional retail names with concise 1-page investment tear sheets.
This custom model provides a template for calculating the impact of a 25% tariff on goods from China imported into the U.S. including average unit cost increase, margin hit in basis points, earnings reduction and average unit retail necessary to offset tariff impact.
Use our Tariff QuikCalc Model (click here) to quickly calculate the impact to a retailer's cost, margins, earnings, and, most importantly, to determine the percent increase in prices needed to offset the tariff. We have done this work for our coverage universe, but this is only a small sample of the retailers, vendors, and manufacturers impacted. Therefore, we developed a "quick and dirty" model to give you a general sense of the impact. For the average specialty retailer, we estimate an average unit cost increase of 4.2%, which if entirely unmitigated through price increases results in an average earnings reduction of 35%. The average unit price increase necessary to offset the higher tariff is 2.1%.
The April reading was the fourth consecutive month at 1 or the worst score possible. In April, 50% of retailers posted a short position >15% (up from 47.8% in March). We note the percentage of retailers with a short position over 15% continues to increase month-over-month. We rank Sector Sentiment on a scale of “1” being the most negative sentiment to “10” being the most positive sentiment. The basis for the ranking is based on the number of retailers in the sector with >15% short positions.
- 1 of 22
- next →