Utility earnings rose 5.0% in Q1, slightly above our 4.9% estimate. No companies changed guidance for 2019 but the same companies that disappointed at year end had issues again such as AGR, CNP, and NI (not EVRG, phew). Earnings quality stuck out to us as weak with tax or other gains driving numbers at SRE, DUK, NRG among others. AEP may have been the most incrementally positive with increasing confidence in the upper half of their 5-7% growth rate. Mega project risk continued to overhang D and DUK (ACP) and SRE (more Cameron delays), though SO kept Vogtle on schedule (for now). Finally, weak renewables conditions hurt in Q1 causing misses at AGR, CWEN, and NEP, but the influence of renewables keeps accelerating overall.
Search Coverage List, Models & Reports
Search Results1-10 out of 258
The fear of a less favorable regulatory environment in the UK persists, and Ofgem is expected to issue a final decision in the RIIO-2 sector specific methodology for transmission and gas distribution this month. Although Ofgem has said that consultation decision should not be a read-across to distribution network operators (e.g., PPL’s WPD), we anticipate the market will do just that. PPL believes it can manage through the RIIO-2 framework (which will be in place Apr 2023 for PPL) and expects incremental investments in the UK to meet policy targets, like electrification. Still, shares have again trailed the UTY recently and are nearing the relative lows reached last Dec; they also trade at a 27% discount to US utilities. We believe when the UK fears stabilize, the market will revert to a more reasonable P/E based valuation. Outperform.
Several companies rebased their growth rates that effectively lowered long-term numbers - AGR, EVRG, CNP, DUK and NI. While these were all for different reasons, we see more strain in utilities to keep growing 5% or more. We also saw several companies talk to slower dividend growth for the first time in several years – DUK, PPL, EIX, NI, and D. Mega project risks and event risks seem to be spreading in the sector. Risk-averse investors tell us they are seeing their investable universe shrink as they try to avoid project risk, big equity needs, poor management, higher-risk businesses, and of course, CA. The problem is the “clean” companies keep trading at higher and higher multiples which in and of itself becomes a risk.
PPL’s 2018 EPS of $2.40 beat consensus; but 2019 guidance of $2.30-2.50 was a little light of consensus’ $2.44, and 2020 guidance was unchanged at $2.54-2.58. The focus was on PPL’s 2021 guidance of $2.50-2.80, reflecting lower pension deficit revenue, a $1.35-1.60 GBP FX rate and to a lesser extent other items. Consensus on 2021E was $2.59 and our previous estimate was $2.42, reflecting about $0.17 reduction for pension and a FX rate near $1.30. We now project $2.51, largely on a pension hit of $0.10. Although there is risk to PPL’s range, mgmt. sees upside from sales growth, capex outside its plan, and O&M savings. PPL stock has trailed the UTY in recent weeks on UK uncertainty but is still ahead YTD by about 250bp. PPL trades at a 24% discount to US utilities. We believe when the UK fears stabilize, the market will revert to a more reasonable P/E based valuation. Reiterate Outperform.
We hosted our annual investor meeting with the Moody’s team to get their latest credit views on the utilities, power and midstream sectors. For utilities, things have quieted down (ex California) as tax reform impacts have largely played out as expected. FFO/D metrics have dropped 150-200bps on average due to lost deferred tax cash flows and currently sit in the 15-16% area and likely stay there. Companies have taken actions to support their metrics (lot of equity) and have better visibility on regulatory treatment of tax reform. So 2019 is about executing on plans, hitting metrics and sticking to balanced funding plans (ie more equity). Moody’s still has a negative outlook on the sector but will likely go back to stable with good 2019 execution.
PCG’s threat and subsequent filing of bankruptcy kept utility investors very occupied in January. Even if investors did not own PCG itself they had to deal with knock-on effects on other CA utilities like EIX and on the renewables suppliers NEE, NEP, CWEN, ED, etc. These names dominated the worst performers of the month and were part of the reason why utilities only rose 3.4% in January trailing the market rally by 450bps.
PCG’s impending bankruptcy will impact a wide swath of companies especially renewables suppliers. These include large ones investors are aware of (CWEN, NEE/NEP, ED) and smaller ones not so obvious (NRG, DTE, likely others). For the other CA utilities, EIX and SRE, investors will be focused on what this means for getting long-term fixes for wildfire risks. Project risk continues to rear its ugly head as we have seen with ACP pipeline delays. Key updates this quarter include D/DUK on ACP, SO on Vogtle, AGR on NECEC and Vineyard Wind, and SRE on Cameron. Pension risk (and OPEBs and NDTs) due to the Q4 market swoon and drop in rates could hurt as D highlighted recently. NI, ETR and others may face some headwind.
Can utilities keep the defensive rally going? We’re skeptical. Utilities beat the market by 1500bps in Q4 2018 and outperformed 670bps for the year. This may continue near term given a host of negative macro signals, but these big defensive utility moves have historically been good times to take profits in the group.
Utilities eked out a small 0.5% gain for 2018 on the heels of a massive Q4 rally as the market turned decidedly defensive ending the year down 6.2%. Utilities 670bps outperformance came despite a lot of headwinds on the group including higher interest rates (10-yr up 23bps), lack of tax reform benefits, over $15B of equity issuance, and the CA fires impact. Investors were looking for any place to hide and utilities fit the bill especially given their lack of exposure to tariffs and recession fears. Utilities came in second among income sectors for the year trailing only Pharma which was up 5.2%. Interestingly, all other income sectors underperformed the market in 2018 (see Exhibit 1). We remain cautious on utilities going into 2019 given their heavy dependence on a negative macro call and very high relative valuations (20% adjusted P/E premium vs the historic avg of 3%). In our view, buying defensive sectors at historically large premiums is not defensive.
- 1 of 26
- next →