They say bull markets climb a wall of worries and this year has been a great example. November was a breakout month for the S&P 500 (up 3.4%) and a breakdown month for defensive sectors like utilities (down 2.3%). The market is now up 25.3% for the year beating utilities by 680bps. This is despite a nearly 100bps decline in 10-year Treasury bond yields YTD. In retrospect, utilities moved ahead of bonds with their strong yearend 2018 move so they had less room to run once it happened. And lower bond yields and Fed easing have helped the market even more than utilities. While there is a lot to worry about in 2020, not the least of which is the election, we remain underweight utilities and wait for the current 10% premium to get closer to its historic 4% average.
Search Coverage List, Models & Reports
Filter your search criteria by one or more categories below.
Search Results
1-10 out of 147After close on 11/25, a CPUC ALJ issued a proposed decision in the Cost of Capital applications, which will set allowed returns and capital structures for each CA utility’s respective state-regulated rate base in 2020-22. The ROEs would be unchanged for EIX (10.30%) and PCG (10.25%). SRE’s SDG&E electric would get 10.20% vs 10.15% currently. EIX’s SCE would get a 52% equity ratio (vs 48%) – in line with the other two utilities. Balancing fire and inverse risk against a lower interest environment, we see the PD as in line with expectations. The ROEs would be close to the midpoint between the utilities’ requests and intervenors’ recommendations: 115-220bp increases due largely to wildfire risk vs 150-185bp decreases. And the political backlash from recent shutoffs does not appear to have significantly impacted the PD.
This morning, it was announced that Dutch energy company Eneco would be purchased by Mitsubishi (80%) and Chubu Electric Power (20%) for $4.1B Euros. This followed a sale process that kicked off almost a year ago, which garnered interest from the likes of Shell, KKR, Macquarie, and EDF as well (Total and Enel dropped out earlier). This got us thinking. Asian investors have already shown a keen interest in U.S. power plant investments, as seen by the readily available financing in CCGT new build. Why couldn’t one of these foreign power companies buy a U.S. IPP? Granted, Eneco is a bit different, in that it has a quasi-regulated gas and electric retail business, as well as growing investments in renewable energy that includes offshore wind. But clearly there is an interest here to diversify out of Asia. When we published our annual power supply update back in September, the number of Japanese and Korean utilities investing in U.S. gas plants was endless.
We’ve now been waiting 17 months for FERC to decide on new PJM capacity auction rules since determining its tariff was unjust/unreasonable. There have been a few false starts, but with Commissioner Glick’s recusal on the issue set to end on 11/29 and James Danly’s nomination as commissioner moving one step closer this week, we feel as though an actual order is finally upon us. In this note, we’re simply reviewing exposures to hypothetical scenarios. At the end of the day, it’s probably fair to say that EXC and VST have the most at stake here. However, it’s important to note that the PJM capacity auction is simply not as important as it used to be. EXC has the most capacity in PJM and addressing its subsidized (and non-subsidized) nuclear plants is critical in how this plays out. VST has the second most capacity in PJM, with about 25% of its EBITDA coming from energy/capacity revenues combined in the region.
FERC issued an order today in two MISO transmission ROE complaints, setting a methodology that differed from its last proposal, establishing a 9.88% base ROE and dismissing the last of the two complaints. That 9.88% base is lower than the 10.3% that FERC set a few years ago under a methodology that has since been vacated. FERC did not rule on the four New England ISO ROE complaints, as Comm. Glick – one of the three seated FERC commissioners (two vacancies) – cannot vote on those. But that base ROE also likely would decline under today’s order. Transmission makes up less than half of earnings for the impacted utilities (FTS and ES almost 40%, AEE 20%). To the negative, the base ROEs are now under 10%, which optically looks bad, given they were around 12% earlier this decade and are now in line with the 9.7% average awarded at the state level. But the MISO names will still earn about 10.4% – when including the 50bp RTO/ISO adder.
The annual EEI conference will be held November 10-12. Management from most of our covered companies will be there. This report is a helpful guide for investors attending and includes questions to ask each company and summary model information.
After a long headline-filled year, the S&P 500 broke out to new highs last month and caught up to utilities, both up a little over 21% through October. The market has climbed a wall of doubters, while our recent poll shows utilities continuing to gain investor support. From a contrarian standpoint, we take the market. Investors have been leaning defensive most of the year such that a typical year-end defensive trade seems unlikely. In fact, the defensive trade over the past few weeks has been to buy depressed value stocks and cyclicals. Utilities still trade at a 17% premium to the market and we would like to see them closer to the average to be more constructive.
NI provided initial 2020 guidance of $1.36-1.40 which was in-line with us/consensus and reaffirmed its 5-7% annual EPS growth expectation through 2022. This came despite $500-700M of incremental equity needed in 2020 to cover MA costs above its casualty insurance. The equity needs were not a surprise, but the ability to reaffirm the growth expectation beyond 2020 was reassuring. Timing of the issuance is unclear, but our sense is to not expect anything before yearend. The impact of the new shares won’t be reflected until some point in the second half of next year in order to minimize the dilutive effect on 2020 numbers.
We are seeing a wider divergence heading into Q3 and EEI between those having constructive updates (offense) vs those having overhangs or issues to address (defense). The offensive team includes AEP, LNT, CMS, WEC, and XEL that will be refreshing L-T capital plans and extending L-T growth rates. The list of those forced to play defense seems to be growing: EXC (IL legal overhang), CNP (TX rate case, non-utility), EVRG (Sibley impact, buyback vs capex), NI (operational issues, more equity), EIX/PCG (fire risks, wildfire fund accounting), AGR (project delays), PNW (regulatory) among others. Finally, a few appear to be transitioning to offense from defense including SRE (positive GRC, asset sales, LNG growth, etc) and D (more regulated growth, ACP progress). Overall, we expect Q3 earnings up 3.6% led by favorable weather and 2019/2020 bottom-up growth is 4.1% / 6.2% respectively.
It may have went under the radar, but last week FES reached a settlement with labor unions in its pending bankruptcy proceeding – resolving all issues and filing for approval at a hearing tomorrow (10/15). FES assumes all collective bargaining agreements in the settlement. We now expect the plan of reorganization to be confirmed by the judge. Once complete, the only remaining step before FES can emerge is the NRC licenses transfer for its nukes. FES filed for approval in late-April, with this typically taking 6-9 months. All appears to be on track to emerge by year-end – about one year after the last power generator came out of bankruptcy (GenOn).
- 1 of 15
- next →