Search Coverage List, Models & Reports
Search Results1-10 out of 186
In the last earnings call of the YE18 utility reporting season, EIX disclosed a $2.5B ($1.8B after-tax) charge related to wildfire claims. The amount/timing are somewhat surprising, but EIX warned last fall about potential involvement of its equipment in the 2017 Thomas Fire, which caused over $2B of insured losses when including subsequent mudslides. Then, the Woolsey Fire caused damage in Nov 2018, with over $3B of insured losses. CAL Fire has yet to determine the cause of either fire. EIX has underperformed the UTY by around 300bp YTD. We believe any legislation that limits or eliminates wildfire liability risk to utilities would benefit EIX, but the upside to EIX stock is much less than that to PCG (see note).
We hosted our annual investor meeting with the Moody’s team to get their latest credit views on the utilities, power and midstream sectors. For utilities, things have quieted down (ex California) as tax reform impacts have largely played out as expected. FFO/D metrics have dropped 150-200bps on average due to lost deferred tax cash flows and currently sit in the 15-16% area and likely stay there. Companies have taken actions to support their metrics (lot of equity) and have better visibility on regulatory treatment of tax reform. So 2019 is about executing on plans, hitting metrics and sticking to balanced funding plans (ie more equity). Moody’s still has a negative outlook on the sector but will likely go back to stable with good 2019 execution.
PCG’s threat and subsequent filing of bankruptcy kept utility investors very occupied in January. Even if investors did not own PCG itself they had to deal with knock-on effects on other CA utilities like EIX and on the renewables suppliers NEE, NEP, CWEN, ED, etc. These names dominated the worst performers of the month and were part of the reason why utilities only rose 3.4% in January trailing the market rally by 450bps.
What does PCG need from CA to avoid a bankruptcy filing? We think they need line of sight to recovery for 2017/2018 fires and structural changes on a much quicker time frame than currently set. They also need to know someone in CA leadership is willing to negotiate a deal with them – either the Gov office or PUC.
Can utilities keep the defensive rally going? We’re skeptical. Utilities beat the market by 1500bps in Q4 2018 and outperformed 670bps for the year. This may continue near term given a host of negative macro signals, but these big defensive utility moves have historically been good times to take profits in the group.
Utilities eked out a small 0.5% gain for 2018 on the heels of a massive Q4 rally as the market turned decidedly defensive ending the year down 6.2%. Utilities 670bps outperformance came despite a lot of headwinds on the group including higher interest rates (10-yr up 23bps), lack of tax reform benefits, over $15B of equity issuance, and the CA fires impact. Investors were looking for any place to hide and utilities fit the bill especially given their lack of exposure to tariffs and recession fears. Utilities came in second among income sectors for the year trailing only Pharma which was up 5.2%. Interestingly, all other income sectors underperformed the market in 2018 (see Exhibit 1). We remain cautious on utilities going into 2019 given their heavy dependence on a negative macro call and very high relative valuations (20% adjusted P/E premium vs the historic avg of 3%). In our view, buying defensive sectors at historically large premiums is not defensive.
Our utility financial “checkup” examines projections for utility balance sheets and credit metrics. Tax reform was the overarching theme in 2018 for utility balance sheets and precipitated a large portion of the equity deals completed this year; in total, we saw +$19B completed across our coverage via blocks, forwards, or internally. Since our mid-year review, we now project slightly better FFO/debt in 2020 (+0.5%) due to equity issuances and asset sales. EV/EBITDA is now a half-turn higher given the run-up in equity valuations. Overall, we continue to see utility financial metrics stagnating with higher leverage at certain companies leading to wide P/E dispersion.
Market volatility in October caught many off-guard and the hope was things would settle down post earnings. Well they got much worse spurred by the disruption of the CA fires. PCG and EIX ended November down 44% and 20%, respectively, on the heels of the destructive fires. These were popular value names in the utility space and their sharp stock collapses clearly caused investor pain. However, the second derivative impact was just as meaningful. The “Anything but California” trade took over amidst utilities, lifting already expensive low-risk utilities to higher levels. Many investors got just as hurt by being short or underweight these names as being long CA. With investors suffering and year end approaching, the last two weeks have showed signs of portfolios shrinking and extreme risk-aversion which has only exacerbated the problem. Everyone needs a holiday.
Last week, as the California utilities collapsed amidst the fire risks, we saw increasing investor focus on second derivative impacts. One of the obvious ones relates to renewables contracts with the CA utilities, especially PCG who drew down their bank lines last week. The primary concern is what will happen to these contracts in the event that PCG files for bankruptcy due to all the fire-related claims. This primarily impacted NEP and CWEN, given they have the most exposure, though there has been somewhat of a relief rally as investors realized the chance of a PCG bankruptcy in the near-term is low. Importantly, even if there was a surprise filing at some point, we believe these power contracts with the California utilities are likely to hold up. We are buyers on the recent weakness and view NEP as a top idea here.
- 1 of 19
- next →