Can utilities keep the defensive rally going? We’re skeptical. Utilities beat the market by 1500bps in Q4 2018 and outperformed 670bps for the year. This may continue near term given a host of negative macro signals, but these big defensive utility moves have historically been good times to take profits in the group.
Search Coverage List, Models & Reports
Search Results1-10 out of 183
Utilities eked out a small 0.5% gain for 2018 on the heels of a massive Q4 rally as the market turned decidedly defensive ending the year down 6.2%. Utilities 670bps outperformance came despite a lot of headwinds on the group including higher interest rates (10-yr up 23bps), lack of tax reform benefits, over $15B of equity issuance, and the CA fires impact. Investors were looking for any place to hide and utilities fit the bill especially given their lack of exposure to tariffs and recession fears. Utilities came in second among income sectors for the year trailing only Pharma which was up 5.2%. Interestingly, all other income sectors underperformed the market in 2018 (see Exhibit 1). We remain cautious on utilities going into 2019 given their heavy dependence on a negative macro call and very high relative valuations (20% adjusted P/E premium vs the historic avg of 3%). In our view, buying defensive sectors at historically large premiums is not defensive.
Our utility financial “checkup” examines projections for utility balance sheets and credit metrics. Tax reform was the overarching theme in 2018 for utility balance sheets and precipitated a large portion of the equity deals completed this year; in total, we saw +$19B completed across our coverage via blocks, forwards, or internally. Since our mid-year review, we now project slightly better FFO/debt in 2020 (+0.5%) due to equity issuances and asset sales. EV/EBITDA is now a half-turn higher given the run-up in equity valuations. Overall, we continue to see utility financial metrics stagnating with higher leverage at certain companies leading to wide P/E dispersion.
Market volatility in October caught many off-guard and the hope was things would settle down post earnings. Well they got much worse spurred by the disruption of the CA fires. PCG and EIX ended November down 44% and 20%, respectively, on the heels of the destructive fires. These were popular value names in the utility space and their sharp stock collapses clearly caused investor pain. However, the second derivative impact was just as meaningful. The “Anything but California” trade took over amidst utilities, lifting already expensive low-risk utilities to higher levels. Many investors got just as hurt by being short or underweight these names as being long CA. With investors suffering and year end approaching, the last two weeks have showed signs of portfolios shrinking and extreme risk-aversion which has only exacerbated the problem. Everyone needs a holiday.
Last week, as the California utilities collapsed amidst the fire risks, we saw increasing investor focus on second derivative impacts. One of the obvious ones relates to renewables contracts with the CA utilities, especially PCG who drew down their bank lines last week. The primary concern is what will happen to these contracts in the event that PCG files for bankruptcy due to all the fire-related claims. This primarily impacted NEP and CWEN, given they have the most exposure, though there has been somewhat of a relief rally as investors realized the chance of a PCG bankruptcy in the near-term is low. Importantly, even if there was a surprise filing at some point, we believe these power contracts with the California utilities are likely to hold up. We are buyers on the recent weakness and view NEP as a top idea here.
The annual EEI conference will be held November 11-13. Management from most of our covered companies will be there. This report is a helpful guide for investors attending and includes questions to ask each company and summary model information. Some of the industry topics we will be focusing on include:
Utilities rose 1.9% in October beating the market by 880bps. This was the 9th best relative month for the sector since the S&P GICS were formed in 1995. It was the second best in the last 17 years. The month started with bond yields breaking out to a new 7-year high and we thought it would put the nail in the coffin for utilities. But rising bond yields ended up killing the market instead while utilities actually rallied hard. This defensive trade was evident in other sectors as well with Staples rising 2.1% for the month, slightly ahead of utilities. We view this utility rally as a trick, not a treat. Bond yields are still near 7-yr highs and would not be here if a recession was coming. The relative valuation of the sector is well above average on both a P/E and yield basis. We continue to recommend fading this rally.
AEE’s 3Q18 EPS of $1.50 beat consensus of $1.31 due partly to weather and timing of tax expense and associated revenue. AEE raised FY18 core EPS guidance for the second straight quarter to $3.35-3.45 from $3.15-3.35. AEE introduced 2019 drivers mostly in line with expectations. AEE will update its EPS growth rate, currently 5-7% through 2022, on the 4Q18 earnings call in Feb. The update will include $2B of capex related to grid mod and wind projects in MO through 2023. We see about 8% growth through 2021. AEE outperformed the UTY by 50bp yesterday and is beating it by 770bp YTD. We downgraded AEE last week to Peer Perform from Outperform, along with other high premium names, strictly on valuation (see It’s not you, it’s P/E note). We still think AEE is a premium story given its jurisdictions (MO, IL, FERC). But valuation seems fair.
This note feels like breaking up with our best friends. AEE, CMS, DTE and WEC are high quality utilities that we have liked for a very long time. At some point, there is a price for everything though and with the stocks at 18-19x P/Es on 2-year forward earnings and 10%+ premiums to the sector average, we struggle to see upside from here. In past utility rallies, we have been more flexible on valuation since bond yields were historically low. But bond yields are now at 7-year highs and at the same time these stocks are hitting new all-time highs. These companies will consistently grow 5-8% and we have high confidence they will execute, but we are not willing to pay as much for that in a higher rate environment. We think it’s prudent to move to the sidelines and look for a better price to jump back in.
FERC issued an order for paper hearings on its new proposed transmission ROE methodology. The proposal responds to an Apr 2017 Appeals Court ruling that vacated and remanded FERC’s 2014 order in the first New England ISO transmission ROE challenge. In the 2014 order, FERC reduced the base ROE to 10.57% from 11.14% and capped the total ROE (with incentives) at 11.74%. The NE ROE was challenged three more times. Two complaints were made against transmission owners in MISO, with FERC reducing the base ROE and cap. On 10/18, FERC will discuss its proposal. Our initial take is neutral to slightly negative. Although the ROE cap could rise, new base ROEs could be lower than those set in recent years using the upper midpoint of a zone of reasonableness (ZoR).
- 1 of 19
- next →