Mid-day Rumblings following our quarterly Crew Change & Upstream Activity Update. On the activity front, we lowered our capex, drilling and pumping estimates in NAM, with capex/drilling sharpened around high single-digit int’l growth in FY19/FY20. The next activity bogey will be when E&Ps provide guidance for FY20 (which we will likely use as a ‘steadier-state’ proxy for growth over the coming 3-5 years). Key takes from the recap 1) FCF: Although 2Q underwhelmed, the FCF thesis is playing out with OFS (in aggregate) cutting growth, 2) Pricing: OFS controls its own destiny wrt FY20 FCF via pricing discipline (perhaps more autonomy than other parts of the energy value chain that are more beholden to commodity volume/pricing), and 3) Int’l: Cycle will continue to be a key stabilizing force to ests. We also installed a FCF yield framework, whereby our revised top picks HAL, PTEN, TS, and LBRT (conditionally, PUMP) screen very favorably.
Search Coverage List, Models & Reports
Filter your search criteria by one or more categories below.
Search Results
1-10 out of 116We are updating our Capex, Drilling, Pumping, and Production models, in tandem with our 2Q19 Quarterly Crew Change (OFS earnings recap)
Within, we are lowering NTM EV/EBITDA multiples and YE19 price targets across our coverage, in addition to upgrading Tenaris (TS) to Outperform (from PP)
CHOW – OFS exposure by operator, 2H19 spending, and potential revenue impact. Building upon our E&P capex-themed charts from the past several Rumblings, this week we attempt to frame the 2H completions slowdown by determining pumper-specific exposure to each operator. Combining E&P capex guidance and Rystad completion data, we calculate the potential revenue impact and percentage fall-off from 1H19 levels (ex-price/efficiency fluctuations). Given a high percentage of “unallocated” E&P completions (i.e. OFS unknown), the chart may underserve market share volatility and pumper exposure to a particular E&P. Nevertheless, well-tabulated FracFocus records for HAL (larger 2H falloff) and SLB (modest falloff) show somewhat divergent trajectories as the broader frac complex braces for activity to decelerate. Please reach out for further explanation of the methodology/results.
We led off 2Q OFS earnings with an update on our US shale productivity thesis, calling out a near-term Permian productivity peak as E&Ps shift fully to pad development. So far, CXO’s Dominator spacing test has (appropriately) dominated the Permian discussion, and our E&P colleagues have covered and spoken extensively on the topic. For OFS, the most important implications go beyond Permian acreage inventory/M&A. For NAM OFS, well/stage up-spacing could offset continued per-rig and per-frac crew efficiency gains (positive for domestic OFS demand). For global OFS, a peak/inflection in US shale productivity, particularly in the context of the low-growth E&P framework, could be a stabilizing force to supply-side oil broadly (predictability from which could stimulate int’l activity with better OFS earnings power, key for SLB, HAL, BHGE and investability of the sector).
Yesterday (07/30/19) was one of the greener days for OFS in recent memory, with chatter suggesting that rotation (out of momentum?) into energy, and the subsequent short squeeze amplified an otherwise decent oil tape. For those companies that reported (NBR +30% & NOV +11% in our coverage) the moves were more pronounced. While neither NBR/NOV print signaled a drastic upward earnings inflection (although int’l momentum is helping to stabilize estimates) both companies followed the familiar 2Q OFS playbook of 1) caveating 2H19 friction in NAM, and 2) cutting capex (for NBR, a more pronounced FY20 capex cut in-line with peers). If it stands, the reported API crude draw last night could inject more life into an underperforming OFS subsector that is aligning costs/capex quickly with E&P.
An acceleration of May/June filings in the Permian/Bakken suggests a steady grind higher from the March 1Q peak, while auxiliary basins (namely Anadarko & Northeast) remain lumpy. Nevertheless, 2Q turned out to be a modest growth quarter for USL frac activity. On the one hand, Rystad data squares with E&P commentary around a “pull forward” of 2H activity (in the context of YE budget exhaustion). On the other hand, the data update also overstates frac revenue growth for the handful of OFS companies that have reported (all else equal). Bottom line, if higher-than-expected Rystad frac growth is correct for 2Q, then L48 production should still see positive supply adjustments in lieu of counter-seasonal inventory builds. Also, OFS really needs to stop shedding price.
On a busy day of earnings in which the USL drilling narrative (finally) took a leg down, relative OP of the CLB shares was rooted in the firming of estimates around the int’l/Res Des outlook. By comparison, CLB’s 2Q print was arguably weaker than that of PTEN/HP, but a benign 3Q CLB guide underscores the importance of an int’l/offshore earnings bridge across an otherwise capricious 2H19 NAM landscape. Uncertainty surrounding CLB segment exposure to USL was a focal point of the call, and while we would point to weakness on the NAM service side of both RD/PE (implied by +18% QoQ growth in energetic vs. PE decline), hitting the 3Q guide in a weaker NAM environment would lend credence to more pivotal int’l undercurrents.
CLB reported 2Q19 earnings after market close today and is hosting a conference call to review results tomorrow (7/25) at 8:30am ET.
So far, investor feedback from what we viewed as constructive SLB/HAL earnings commentary has been decidedly split between 1) those encouraged by the capital discipline as a “bridge” to refreshed FY20 NAM budgets, and 2) those dubious that the bottom is in for pricing/margins (or that cost takeout will not offset a weakening NAM outlook). We came out in our preview (link) citing stronger-than-expected FCF as the key 2Q19 catalyst/theme (either in print or 2H19 guide), and so far both SLB (link) and HAL (link) have leveraged continued capex cuts to drive (modest) incremental positivity back into the sector. Beyond cost/capital allocation, clearly generalist investors need to see evidence of sustained earnings power improvement, which we believe will follow SLB/HAL discipline as equipment cannibalization/scrapping accelerates and the E&P spending mix shifts to higher-quality int’l/offshore activity. So far so good through early 2Q earnings – clearly OFS is ready to mirror E&P discipline – but earnings power follow-through is still difficult to discern given lack of upward revisions.
- 1 of 12
- next →