Momentum has no valuation ceiling while risks and uncertainties have no valuation floor. This is the story within utilities and among the market overall. A choppy Q2 due to unfavorable weather and weaker core sales growth seemed to only exacerbate this trend. A few companies appear to be re-rating on lower risk perceptions – ETR, FE, EVRG, SO, EIX, SRE – but otherwise we continue to see more divergence between the pure play safe regulateds vs those with diversified businesses or project/regulatory risk. Given our value focus, we are resigned to keep focusing on the messy ones.
Search Coverage List, Models & Reports
Search Results1-10 out of 29
We are downgrading Cheniere Energy Partners to Peer Perform from Outperform. The partnership has been one of the best performing MLPs YTD and it trades expensive vs. its parent and 49% owner Cheniere Inc. Once Sabine 6 is completed in 2023 CQP's growth and distribution potential will have largely topped out and we don't see a big motivation for LNG to roll CQP up at current relative levels. Bottom line, we see LNG as the much more attractive vehicle at this point and it's hard to argue for CQP further rerating higher from current levels or our $45 target price (up from $42).
E&P concerns continued to rise this week after CXO announced a reduction in expected Permian production growth, adding to previous worries stemming from lowered production guidance by EQT and COG the week before. In this week’s report, we dive into the recent E&P weakness and how it may impact midstream moving forward. Now that we are roughly halfway through earnings, we also take a look at some trends that have emerged so far and our expectations for some of the companies reporting this week.
We project YoY growth of 4% in DCF/share in Q1. This is attractive total return when combined with average 6-7% yields. The macro environment remains in somewhat of a sweet spot that should drive continued U.S. volume growth and infrastructure needs. Biggest Q1 beats include MMP, ET, and EPD.
For the second straight year, FERC tried to steal the spotlight from the NCAA on the first day of March Madness, but this year the consequences were not nearly as drastic for midstream companies. FERC opened an NOI for the ROE rate setting process for oil and gas pipeline companies. Among other questions, FERC has asked for stakeholders’ opinions on the validity of the current two-stage DCF methodology and whether or not to incorporate CAPM, risk premium, and expected earnings models. As FERC awaits feedback, investors are contemplating the possible outcomes. Could the expanded approach impact ROEs significantly? When would the proposed changes come into effect?
We thought results in Q4 were solid with an average EBITDA beat of 3%. DCF/share growth of 8% YoY in Q4 was down from the breakneck double digit growth seen in Q2 (13%) and Q3 (18%), but is clearly still attractive total return when combined with safe 7% yields. Our updated forecasts still call for 5% DCF/share growth in 2019, preserving a low double digit total return investment proposition. That said, the group now seems more dependent on a valuation call near-term given more uncertainty over the pace of production growth and concerns over high levels of competition and a cyclical shift toward potential overbuild.
Can utilities keep the defensive rally going? We’re skeptical. Utilities beat the market by 1500bps in Q4 2018 and outperformed 670bps for the year. This may continue near term given a host of negative macro signals, but these big defensive utility moves have historically been good times to take profits in the group.
Market volatility in October caught many off-guard and the hope was things would settle down post earnings. Well they got much worse spurred by the disruption of the CA fires. PCG and EIX ended November down 44% and 20%, respectively, on the heels of the destructive fires. These were popular value names in the utility space and their sharp stock collapses clearly caused investor pain. However, the second derivative impact was just as meaningful. The “Anything but California” trade took over amidst utilities, lifting already expensive low-risk utilities to higher levels. Many investors got just as hurt by being short or underweight these names as being long CA. With investors suffering and year end approaching, the last two weeks have showed signs of portfolios shrinking and extreme risk-aversion which has only exacerbated the problem. Everyone needs a holiday.
Last week, as the California utilities collapsed amidst the fire risks, we saw increasing investor focus on second derivative impacts. One of the obvious ones relates to renewables contracts with the CA utilities, especially PCG who drew down their bank lines last week. The primary concern is what will happen to these contracts in the event that PCG files for bankruptcy due to all the fire-related claims. This primarily impacted NEP and CWEN, given they have the most exposure, though there has been somewhat of a relief rally as investors realized the chance of a PCG bankruptcy in the near-term is low. Importantly, even if there was a surprise filing at some point, we believe these power contracts with the California utilities are likely to hold up. We are buyers on the recent weakness and view NEP as a top idea here.
The annual EEI conference will be held November 11-13. Management from most of our covered companies will be there. This report is a helpful guide for investors attending and includes questions to ask each company and summary model information. Some of the industry topics we will be focusing on include:
- 1 of 3
- next →